Blog This!   Lee Geistlinger's Web Log
Blog Home
Blog Archives
LittleGhost Home

E-mail: geistlinger AT gmail.com

Loading
Pic 'O the Day
Top 10 Lists
Everyone loves lists
Reviews
Books, Movies and so on
Blogroll
Feed Me!

XML Feed

Feeds I Read

My Online Aggregator

Theme
• Default
• Spring
• Summer
• Autumn
• Winter
• Black & White
• Gray & White
• MT-ish
• Classic
Listening To...
Evidence of Efforts

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Valid CSS!

[Valid RSS]

Recent Posts
 Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Paying for content (not)

If you've never read Clay Shriky's blockbuster on why newspapers are doomed - Thinking the Unthinkable - well, read same.

On the same subject, there's a great article by Paul Graham, exploring - in a slightly different way - how we never paid for content (in any format).
Publishers of all types, from news to music, are unhappy that consumers won't pay for content anymore. At least, that's how they see it.

In fact consumers never really were paying for content, and publishers weren't really selling it either. If the content was what they were selling, why has the price of books or music or movies always depended mostly on the format? Why didn't better content cost more?

A copy of Time costs $5 for 58 pages, or 8.6 cents a page. The Economist costs $7 for 86 pages, or 8.1 cents a page. Better journalism is actually slightly cheaper.

Almost every form of publishing has been organized as if the medium was what they were selling, and the content was irrelevant. Book publishers, for example, set prices based on the cost of producing and distributing books. They treat the words printed in the book the same way a textile manufacturer treats the patterns printed on its fabrics.

Think about it - buy the book as a hardback, $20. Trade (full-size) paperback, $12. Paperback (the 7x4 inch softcover) - let's say $6. I'm making up prices, but the trend holds true: Same words (content), but consumer cost is marketing/printing/distribution costs. While there is some elasticity here - John Grisham's novels (in all formats) may be higher than an unknown author's - but prices quickly stabilize, and we're (in this example) not paying for content, but for production margin.

I don't know the answer, but for print publications (or bank teller/travel agents/real estate agents etc), it is not somehow moving the existing business model to the web while (pretending to) protecting the physical world model.

Hat tip to Jeff Jarvis.

- Posted by Lee at 9:30 PM Permalink #
^Top | Top Ten Home | Blog This! Home | Blog This! Archives